obsolete [ὰbsəlíːt] 쇠퇴한, 한물간
Grand Old Party 공화당
bashing [bǽʃiŋ] 세게 때리기, 타격
incumbent [inkΛmbənt] 현직의,재직의, ~의 책무인
co-chair 공동 의장
pollster [póulstər] 여론 조사원 poll taker
veteran [vétərən] 퇴역 군인
retreat [ritríːt] 퇴각, 철수, 후퇴
foremost 맨 먼저의, 선두의, (the) 가장 중요한
beck [bek] 신호의 몸짓, 급류
confound [kanfáund] 당황하게 vt, (with) 혼동vt
forestry [fɔ́ːrəstri] 삼림지
polymer [pάləmər] 폴리머
bankroll [bǽŋkròul] (사업 등에) 자금을 대다
Jim : I just couldn't be less interested in WikiLeaks.
Neal : You're nuts. The open sourcing of classified information is going to be an absolute game changer for journalists of our generation.
Jim : All I heard was sounds coming from the mouth of a nerd.
Neal : Have you scanned the WikiLeaks cables?
Jim : No, Neal. Because I spend my time trying to find and protect my sources.
Neal : This right here is always the swan song of the obsolete when you stare the future paradigm in the face. "He on the side of technology wins." You know who said that?
Jim : It was you. I was sitting right here.
Neal : Napoleon.
Jim : Things worked out well for him.
Neal : Weren't there girls standing here a minute ago?
Jim : Yes, you scared them off with your Wikinerd pitch.
Charlie : I've been sitting here for two and a half hours and I still don't know why. It's like being in the cast of a Fellini film.
Reese : Was it all GOP bashing, or did we cover anything else?
Charlie : We did almost three times as many international news stories as Fox and MSNBC combined. And unless we're all blind, the Tea Party is the one doing the GOP bashing.
Reese : Charlie, give me a break.
Charlie : Ask Bryce Delaney.
Will : Bryce Delaney became the sixth GOP incumbent to be ousted by a Tea Party candidate. The American Conservative Union gives Delaney a 97% rating over his 10 terms in Congress. He was a Deputy Whip, he was state cochair of the McCain/Palin campaign, and he sponsored or cosponsored 38 pieces of legislation that were signed into law. He lost his primary to a dentist 72-28. Congressman Delaney, thank you for joining us.
Delaney : Thank you.
Will : Congressman, you have a consistent voting record on conservative issues, and in the past five elections you've won your district by double digits. What happened?
Delaney : My pollster tells me that I gave the wrong answer at a town hall meeting.
Will : What was the question?
Delaney : Is President Obama a socialist?
Will : And your answer?
Delaney : My answer was that I disagree with the man on how to run a government, but the talk of him being a socialist or a Marxist or a Kenyan was a silly distraction.
Will : You paid a big price for that. You were leading in the polls at the time.
Delaney : Will, there are brilliant conservative minds in the Republican Party. And the individual price we are paying for not pretending to be crazy is nothing compared to the price that the country is going to pay for not having a reasonable opposition party.
Will : You made another mistake, too, right?
Delaney : You're referring to HR2559.
Will : Yes.
Delaney : I cosponsored a bill.
Will : With a Democrat.
Delaney : Once you're elected, you have a duty to work with other people who have been elected. My friends across the aisle had been elected.
Will : What did HR2559 provide for?
Delaney : It provided for homeless veterans to receive housing vouchers and services such as counseling, job training.
Will : Thank you for your service to your country, sir. You'll be missed in Congress. Good luck.
Delaney : Thank you.
Will : It's not strange I'm not hearing anything from the 44th floor?
Charlie : What were you expecting?
Will : It's just bizarre because the show's taken a pretty sharp turn.
Charlie : She never watched the old show.
Will : What?
Charlie : Maybe once or twice.
Will : Too dumbed down? Has she seen the new show?
Charlie : That's a fair question.
Will : Charlie.
Charlie : She's a Democrat. She gives money.
Will : She gives money to everybody. She bets on all the horses in the race.
Charlie : If there was a problem, I'd have heard about it.
Reese : There's a retreat in Telluride my mother and I have been invited to every year for the last nine years.
Will : We're not here talking about ratings, are we?
Reese : I wonder if what we're about to see has anything to do with why we weren't invited this year.
Will : Does anybody mind if I start drinking a lot of bourbon right now and then a little while later put my fist through his head?
Reese : I think you've had enough bourbon for one lifetime.
Will : Not my lifetime.
Reese : We lost David and Charles.
MacKenzie : Thank you for staying late tonight. I really want to get this one right tomorrow.
Will : Don't we want to get them all right?
MacKenzie : You know what, Hef? There's a Hooters a few blocks from here just filled with waitresses who are stocked like a game fishing pond for you to go... out like a fish with--
Will : You lost the thread, right?
MacKenzie : Yeah. Let's start from the top again. Maggie.
Maggie : Uh, the Tea Party presents itself as a grassroots movement, which means it should be fiercely resistant to central control, especially traditional, uh, uh... uh-- sorry. Especially traditional power structures.
Will : We're joined from Manhattan, Kansas, by Mike Lyndall, a construction contractor, and Sheryl Bell, a registered nurse. Mr. Lyndall and Miss Bell are the founders and cochairs of the Riley County Tea Party Express. Welcome.
MacKenzie : They're gonna say the Tea Party represents the voice of the true owners of the United States.
Will : Mike, tell us why you became involved with the Tea Party movement.
Mike : Well, first and foremost, we want to take our country back.
Will : All right, just to be clear, is your country my country, too?
Mike : Of course.
Will : Okay. Who do you want to take our country back from?
Mike : We want to take it back from a Congress and a president who've forgotten that government derives its power from the consent of the governed and instead is at the beck and call of special interests and corporations.
Will : You describe the Tea Party as a grassroots movement, right?
Bell : Absolutely. We have no central control, no traditional power structure. And that is something that seems to confound the media.
Will : I'm sorry?
Bell : That's what confounds the media. It's what the media doesn't get. We are not being run by a George Soros type figure. We are "We the People."
MacKenzie : There it is.
Jim : They walked right into it. If you follow the money, nearly all of it eventually leads to AFP.
Will : Where does your funding come from?
Bell : What little funding we have comes from private citizens who mail in $5, $10, $1, whatever they can spare.
Will : Okay, have either of you ever heard the name David Koch?
Mike : I'm sorry?
Will : David Koch.
Mike : No.
Will : Have you ever heard the name Charles Koch?
Bell : No.
Will : Have you ever heard the name Koch Industries?
Bell : Are you talking about Coca-Cola?
Will : K-O-C-H. Have either of you heard of Koch Industries?
Bell : Nope.
Will : I think that very soon you will. Koch Industries is the second largest private company in the country. Bigger than Coca-Cola. And the Koch brothers' personal wealth of $50 billion is exceeded only by Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, and they could buy and sell George Soros 10 times over. They own dozens of companies and industries including oil and gas, refining and chemicals, minerals, fertilizer, forestry, polymers and fibers and ranching. You two both attended the Texas Defending the American Dream Summit over the July 4th weekend?
Maggie : It was a Tea Party event. The invitation-- Excuse me. The invitation read...
Will : "Today the voices of average Americans are being drowned out by lobbyists and special interests. But you can do something about it."
Mike : Yes.
Will : That summit was paid for entirely by Americans For Prosperity, AFP, which has two founders-- David and Charles Koch. In the last six months, they've bankrolled Tea Party candidates in excess of $40 million. Sheryl, Mike, are the Koch brothers average Americans whose voices are being drowned out by lobbyists and special interests? I'm confounded.
'The Newsroom Ep.3' 카테고리의 다른 글
| Will goes after Jim DeMint (0) | 2014.05.05 |
|---|---|
| After an apology (0) | 2014.03.14 |
| The opening of an apology (0) | 2014.02.03 |


